It’s only human to sift through the evidence and latch on to any fragment that supports your case. Prosecutors do it. Lawyers do it. Even preachers and theologians do it (there’s a song in there somewhere, I think). It’s only human … which means it’s certainly not divine.
The things we believe are vital to our subconscious, especially in Evangelical Christian circles. In a very large sense, we are what we believe. You’ve probably heard of confirmation bias, the tendency to subconsciously interpret the evidence before us (whether textual, physical, or statistical) in a way that’s consistent with our existing worldview. We cherry-pick and reinvent to protect our self-image. And most of the time we don’t even realize we’re doing it.
So it’s not that surprising when someone accuses me of not taking the Bible seriously. What they generally mean is “Anyone who doesn’t agree with my interpretation of the Bible doesn’t really take the Bible seriously, and here are the proof-texts to prove it!”
As if using isolated verses out of context to prove your point in an internet debate actually amounts to taking the Bible seriously.
The Bible is simultaneously a divine work of amazing unity and a related group of human works spanning several centuries and many genres, including poetry, history, prophecy, apocalypse, epistles, and genealogies. It’s kind of like Jesus in that way – simultaneously fully divine and fully human, as Peter Enns wrote.
Both aspects have to be appreciated and respected, if you want to take the Bible seriously. Isolated verses thrown out with no cultural context (and in translation, no less), used to silence opposition and win arguments? That’s how the world uses knowledge: as a weapon, a means to an end, with the end justifying the means.
I’ll quote a comment I made earlier (I won’t link to the debate, because I think that would just be “pointing fingers” at the person I was arguing with).
The truth is, we can cherry-pick individual verse and parts of verses from the Bible, and honestly, we can use them to “prove” anything – subjugation of women, Biblical support for slavery, predestination, free will, Manifest Destiny (the necessity of conquering “pagan savages” so you can teach them about Jesus), vegetarianism, socialism, capitalism, whatever.
THAT practice is what offends me. Not the scripture, but the use of individual verses (and verse-fragments) as a tool to back up whatever point we’re making.
The Bible can only be respected if it is studied as a whole unity, understanding that it was divinely inspired, but written by human hands. We respect it and take it seriously by studying it as a whole, praying for God’s guidance, AND by learning about the genres, culture, and lives lived by the people who first heard it.
The point is not that I’m wiser or more spiritual than some random person I’m arguing with on the Internet. I’m not. I’m as vulnerable to confirmation bias as anyone. I’m as prone to cherry-pick and proof-text as anyone.
The point is, we all have to be aware – and beware – of our own biases and tendencies. We want the Bible to shape what we believe, but too often it’s the other way around. Sometimes I think we’d all be better off if we stuck with the basics: Do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with God.